How do I supposed to react getting another reference of the underhand understanding between military regime and religious fundamentalism? The present "military-backed civil government" kept their heads down in front of so called fundamentalist protests last week.
From the histroy of South Asia, we know that the term communalism with the mask of religious fundamentalism strengtht themselves under the financing of British Empire since British colonial period. With the partition of British India with respect to the religious-group majority, left Royal Empire the upgrowing seeds of communalism in the mask of religious fundamentalism behind. Panjab and Bengal had been parted into east and west with respect to the hindu and muslim majority. As the world politics had been determind by cold war at that time and also the anti-thesis of Bengal division grew rapidly in the eastern part of former Bengal presideny, which resulted in today's Bangladesh. But as the control of the political hegemony remaind under the benificiaries of the Bengal division, the seeds of religious fundamentalism which was left behind by the british rulling class, dared to activate themselves.
So, from the very begining there had been an obvious relationship between religous fundamentalism and imperialism. We also know from the history the relationship between military regimse and imperialism, which kept continiously promoting religious groups to organize themselves safely.
The incidents last week, shows that the so called military backed civil government has no difference with the previous pure military regimes of 1975-1990. And the so called democratic forces who are preparing themselves for the upcomming parliament elections are infact got very tiny difference with the uniformed forces.
The furstration continues. I would be the happiest one to be an optimist.
news kinks:
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=58970
From the histroy of South Asia, we know that the term communalism with the mask of religious fundamentalism strengtht themselves under the financing of British Empire since British colonial period. With the partition of British India with respect to the religious-group majority, left Royal Empire the upgrowing seeds of communalism in the mask of religious fundamentalism behind. Panjab and Bengal had been parted into east and west with respect to the hindu and muslim majority. As the world politics had been determind by cold war at that time and also the anti-thesis of Bengal division grew rapidly in the eastern part of former Bengal presideny, which resulted in today's Bangladesh. But as the control of the political hegemony remaind under the benificiaries of the Bengal division, the seeds of religious fundamentalism which was left behind by the british rulling class, dared to activate themselves.
So, from the very begining there had been an obvious relationship between religous fundamentalism and imperialism. We also know from the history the relationship between military regimse and imperialism, which kept continiously promoting religious groups to organize themselves safely.
The incidents last week, shows that the so called military backed civil government has no difference with the previous pure military regimes of 1975-1990. And the so called democratic forces who are preparing themselves for the upcomming parliament elections are infact got very tiny difference with the uniformed forces.
The furstration continues. I would be the happiest one to be an optimist.
news kinks:
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=58970
0 comments:
Kommentar veröffentlichen